Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Infect Dis Now ; 53(4): 104673, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2234341

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: While persistent symptoms have been reported after the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), long-term data on outpatients with mild COVID-19 are lacking. The objective was to describe symptoms persisting for 12 months. METHODS: This prospective cohort study on 1767 sailors of an aircraft carrier in which a Covid-19 outbreak occurred during a mission in April 2020 described predefined self-reported symptoms of Long-COVID at 6, 9 and 12 months. Logistic-regression analyses were used to identify correlates for Long-COVID at months 6, 9 and 12. RESULTS: Among the 641 participants, 619 (35%) completed at least one follow-up questionnaire (413 COVID-positive and 206 COVID-negative). Symptoms of Long-COVID were reported by 53.7%, 55.2% and 54.3% of COVID-positive participants vs 31.2%, 23.3% and 40.0% in COVID-negative patients, at 6 (p <.002), 9 (p <.002) and 12 months (p =.13), respectively. The most frequent symptoms reported were concentration and memory difficulties, asthenia and sleep disorders. CONCLUSION: In this study more than half of COVID-positive outpatients reported persistent symptoms up to 12 months post-quarantine. These findings suggests that all patients, including those with mild disease, can be affected by Long-COVID. A lack of difference at 12 months with COVID-negative patienys prompts caution. The symptoms of Long-COVID are so non-specific that they may be viewed as the consequence of multiple intercurrent factors.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Military Personnel , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome , Prospective Studies , Disease Outbreaks , Aircraft
2.
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report ; 69(16):496-498, 2020.
Article in English | GIM | ID: covidwho-1726994

ABSTRACT

The objective of the article was to assess whether there might be a possible association between COVID-19 cleaning recommendations from public health agencies and the media and the number of chemical exposures reported to the National Poison Data System. CDC and the American Association of Poison Control Centers surveillance team compared the number of exposures reported for the period January-March 2020 with the number of reports during the same 3-month period in 2018 and 2019. Fifty-five poison centers in the United States provide free, 24-hour professional advice and medical management information regarding exposures to poisons, chemicals, drugs, and medications. During January-March 2020, poison centers received 45,550 exposure calls related to cleaners (28,158) and disinfectants (17,392), representing overall increases of 20.4% and 16.4% from January-March 2019 (37,822) and January-March 2018 (39,122), respectively. Although NPDS data do not provide information showing a definite link between exposures and COVID-19 cleaning efforts, there appears to be a clear temporal association with increased use of these products.

3.
Clinical Toxicology ; 59(11):1169-1169, 2021.
Article in English | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-1489744
4.
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL